IPv4向IPv6过渡技术综述

北京邮电大学学报 ›› 2002, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (4): 1-5.

• 学术论文 • 下一篇

IPv4向IPv6过渡技术综述

马严, 赵晓宇

北京邮电大学信息网络中心, 北京 100876

收稿日期:2002-10-15 出版日期:2002-11-10
作者简介: 马严(1955—),男,北京邮电大学教授。
基金资助:

Summarization of IPv4 to IPv6 Transition Mechanisms

MA Yan, ZHAO Xiao-yu

Information Network Center, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China)

Received:2002-10-15 Online:2002-11-10
Supported by:

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 如何渐进的、无伤害的由IPv4过渡到IPv6是当前Internet发展所面临的重要问题,本文就现存的过渡策略做了介绍和比较。

关键词: IPv6, 过渡机制, 双协议栈, 协议转换, 隧道

Abstract: The way for the further development of Internet is avery critical issue. This paper enumerated and compared some existing IPv4 to IPv6 transition mechanisms.

Key words: IPv6, transition mechanism, dual stack, NAT-PT, tunnel

中图分类号:

TP393.03

马严, 赵晓宇. IPv4向IPv6过渡技术综述[J]. 北京邮电大学学报, 2002, 25(4): 1-5.

MA Yan, ZHAO Xiao-yu. Summarization of IPv4 to IPv6 Transition Mechanisms[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF POSTS AND TELECOM, 2002, 25(4): 1-5.

[1] Next Generation Internet-priorities for action in migratingto the new Internet protocol IPv6[EB/OL]. http://www.ipv6tf.org/PublicDocuments/com2002-0096en01.pdf, 2002-02-21.
[2] Simple Internet Transition Mechanisms(SIT)[EB/OL]. http://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng/html/ipng-transition.html
[3] Gilligan R, Nordmark E. RFC2893-2000, Transition mechanisms for IPv6 hosts and routers[S].
[4] Tsirtsis G, Srisuresh P. RFC 2766-2000, Network address translation-protocol translation (NAT-PT)[S].
[5] Durand A, Fasano P, Guardini I, Lento D. RFC 3053-2001, IPv6 tunnel broker[S].
[6] Carpenter B, Jung C. RFC 2529-1999, Transmission of IPv6 over IPv4 domains without explicit tunnels[S].
[7] Carpenter B, Moore K. RFC 3056-2001, Connection of IPv6 domains viaIPv4 clouds[S].
[8] Tri Nguyen, Gerard Gastaud, Dirk Ooms. Connecting IPv6 domains across IPv4 clouds with BGP[Z]. Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-ngtrans-bgp-tunnel-04.txt,2002.
[9] Dupont F, Bound Jim, Alain Durand. Dual stack transition mechanism (DSTM)[Z]. Internet-Draft, 2002.
[10] Nordmark E. RFC 2765-2000, Stateless IP/ICMP translation algorithm (SIIT)[S].
[11] Srisuresh P, Egevang K. RFC 3022-2001, Traditional IP network address translator (traditional NAT)[S].
[12] 赵晓宇,马严.ISP由IPv4向IPv6过渡的策略[J].现代电信科技, 2001,(12):21-22.
[13] Huitema C. Teredo: tunneling IPv6 over UDP through NATs[Z]. Internet Draft, 2002.
[14] Tsuchiya K, Higuchi H, Atarashi Y. RFC 2767-2000, Dual stack hosts using the “Bump-In-the-Stack” technique (BIS)[S].
[15] Lee Seungyun. RFC 3338-2002, Dual stack hosts using “bump-in-the-API”(BIA)[S].
[16] Hiroshi Kitamura. RFC3089-2001, A SOCKS-based IPv6/IPv4 gateway mechanism[S].
[17] Hagino J, Yamamoto K. RFC3142-2001, An IPv6-to-IPv4 transport relay translator[S].
[18] Crawford M, Huitema Christian. RFC2874-2000, DNS extensions to support IPv6 address aggregation and renumbering[S].
[19] Kazuaki Tsuchiya. An IPv6/IPv4 multicast translator based on IGMP/MLD proxying[Z]. 2002.

IPv4向IPv6过渡技术综述

Summarization of IPv4 to IPv6 Transition Mechanisms

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 11

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张奇支, 饶亮, 陈源, 胡学聪. 代理移动IPv6的部分分布式移动管理方案[J]. 北京邮电大学学报, 2014, 37(6): 28-33.
[2]	吕晓鹏,王文东,龚向阳,马建. 混合网中的P2P资源共享机制[J]. 北京邮电大学学报, 2011, 34(4): 113-117.
[3]	刘银龙，曾志民，夏海轮，张天魁. 代理移动IPv6的开销分析与自适应优化[J]. 北京邮电大学学报, 2010, 33(5): 56-60.
[4]	李云，王莹，尤肖虎，赵为粮. IEEE 802.16中继网络的快速切换方法[J]. 北京邮电大学学报, 2010, 33(4): 121-125.
[5]	杨立伟. 多级HMIPv6网络中一种基于最小平均切换时延的MAP选择机制（MAHD-MS）[J]. 北京邮电大学学报, 2007, 29(s1): 70-74.
[6]	张静1, 胡捍英1, 程楠2, 童珉1. IPv6网络中OSPFv3洪泛多QoS度量的性能[J]. 北京邮电大学学报, 2007, 30(6): 46-50.
[7]	李智涛1, 崔毅东1, 徐雅静1，刘利宏2, 徐惠民1. IPv6环境下的网络测量模型[J]. 北京邮电大学学报, 2007, 30(6): 23-26.
[8]	彭雪海, 张宏科. 基于分层移动IPv6的移动组播路由算法[J]. 北京邮电大学学报, 2007, 30(3): 108-112.
[9]	宋梅，胡晓，房雅丁，宋俊德. 分级移动IPv6中一种新的鲁棒移动性管理方案[J]. 北京邮电大学学报, 2007, 30(1): 23-27.
[10]	胡博1，李昕1，时岩1，陈山枝2. 一种HMIPv6网络中链式IP寻呼方法[J]. 北京邮电大学学报, 2006, 29(6): 67-71.
[11]	刘亚坤,杨鼎才. VPN安全性分析[J]. 北京邮电大学学报, 2003, 26(S1): 140-143.