[1] 邬江兴. 网络空间拟态安全防御[J]. 保密科学技术, 2014, 1(10):4-9. Wu Jiangxing. Cyber mimic defense[J]. Secrecy Science and Technology, 2014,1(10):4-9. [2] 仝青, 张铮, 张为华, 等. 拟态防御Web服务器设计与实现[J]. 软件学报, 2017, 28(4):883-897. Tong Qing, Zhang Zheng, Zhang Weihua, et al. Design and implementation of mimic defense web server[J]. Journal of Software, 2017, 28(4):883-897. [3] 王禛鹏, 扈红超, 程国振. 一种基于拟态安全防御的DNS框架设计[J]. 电子学报, 2017, 45(11):2705-2714. Wang Zhenpeng, Hu Hongchao, Cheng Guozhen. A DNS architecture based on mimic security defense[J]. Acta Electronic Sinica, 2017, 45(11):2705-2714. [4] 马海龙, 伊鹏, 江逸茗, 等. 基于动态异构冗余机制的路由器拟态防御体系结构[J]. 信息安全学报, 2017, 2(1):29-42. Ma Hailong, Yi Peng, Jiang Yiming, et al. Dynamic heterogeneous redundancy based router architecture with mimic defenses[J]. Journal of Cyber Security, 2017, 2(1):29-42. [5] McAllister D F, Sun C E, Vouk M A. Reliability of voting in fault-tolerant software systems for small output-spaces[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 1990, 39(5):524-534. [6] 欧阳城添, 王曦, 郑剑. 自适应一致表决算法[J]. 计算机科学, 2011, 38(7):130-133. Ouyang Chengtian, Wang Xi, Zheng Jian. Adaptive consensus voting algorithm[J]. Computer Science, 2011, 38(7):130-133. [7] Kovalev I, Voroshilova A, Losev V, et al. Comparative tests of decision making algorithms for a multiversion execution environment of the fault tolerance software[C]//2017 European Conference on Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS). Bern:IEEE, 2017:211-217. [8] 高明, 罗锦, 周慧颖, 等. 一种基于拟态防御的差异化反馈调度判决算法[J]. 电信科学, 2020, 36(5):73-82. Gao Ming, Luo Jin, Zhou Huiying, et al. A differential feedback scheduling decision algorithm based on mimic defense[J]. Telecommunications Science, 2020, 36(5):73-82. [9] 沈丛麒, 陈双喜, 吴春明, 等. 基于信誉度与相异度的自适应拟态控制器研究[J]. 通信学报, 2018, 39(Z2):173-180. Shen Congqi, Chen Shuangxi, Wu Chunming, et al. Adaptive mimic defensive controller frameworkbased on reputation and dissimilarity[J]. Journal on Communications, 2018, 39(Z2):173-180. [10] Gang L, Jian W, Bin H. A new testability allocation method based on improved AHP[C]//2017 29th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC). Chongqing:IEEE, 2017:6390-6394. [11] Geng X. The interactive new algorithm improving the consistency of the judgment matrix in the AHP[C]//2012 IEEE Symposium on Electrical and Electronics Engineering (EEESYM). Kuala Lumpur:IEEE, 2012:559-562. [12] Saaty T L. The analytic hierarchy process[M]. New York:McGraw-Hil, 1980:10-11. [13] Peláez J I, Martínez E A, Vargas L G. Consistency in positive reciprocal matrices:an improvement in measurement methods[J]. IEEE Access, 2018, 6(1):25600-25609. |